News
>BACK

Dangers for Unauthorized Computer Use

Posted on Friday, July 01, 2011 at 12:00PM
Posted by Alison Berry Wilkinson

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that a federal offense may be committed when an employee exceeds the employer’s authorization to access his/her work computer and does so with the intent to defraud the employer.

In United States v. Nosal (Case No. 10-10038 (9th Cir. Apr. 28, 2011)), an employee, who was authorized to access the employer’s database and gathered information for personal use, was charged with a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (18 U.S.C. Section 1030). That statute, among other things, makes it a crime when a person “knowingly and with intent to defraud accesses a protected computer without authorization, or exceeds authorized access, and by means of such conduct furthers the intended fraud and obtains anything of value.”

Here, it was undisputed that the employees who were charged were authorized to access the employer’s database, but the employer’s policy restricted the use of such information to “legitimate” employer business.

Thus, the Court was required to determine whether the taking of information by these employees, for their own personal purposes rather than for the business of the employer, fell within the statute’s provision. This would make it a crime to “exceed authorized access” because the statute defined the phrase to mean “to access a computer with authorization and to use such access to obtain or alter information in the computer that the accessor is not entitled to obtain or alter.” The Court reasoned that the statute is violated where the employer has placed limitations on the employee’s permission to use the computer and the employee has violated or exceeded those limitations.

This does not mean that the mere violation of an employer’s use restrictions is automatically a federal crime. Rather, the act is violated only if the employee violates an employer’s restriction on computer access with an intent to defraud and, by that action, furthers the intended fraud and obtains anything of value. However, it is not yet clear how far the reach of this law will go, and it would be best to avoid being one of the “test” cases.

Berry Wilkinson Law Group, Inc., is a law firm that focuses on labor and employment law with an emphasis on the representation of public safety officers. Formerly a partner at Rains, Lucia & Wilkinson, LLP, Alison remains dedicated to providing effective, quality representation to public employees in civil, criminal, disciplinary and collective bargaining matters.

 

PORAC Legal Defense Administrator Ed Fishman Testimony: Law Enforcement Use of Body Cameras.